It has already been revealed and documented how Democrat loyalists in our Federal Government judged Donald Trump’s Presidency as illegitimate. Since his inauguration there has been a two-year long Mueller investigation by which Democrats and their Media Lapdogs reported daily they had evidence to impeach and remove the Electoral College winner of 2016.
Failures to actually show any evidence as to Russia/Trump election collusion has morphed into Obstruction of Justice, Abuse of Power, Threatening our National Security, Bribery and just about any adjective implying criminality.
While this all plays out in front of the American people - following another multi-week investigation over the President’s activities concerning the Ukraine via the Intelligence Committee hearings – and now coming – the Judiciary Committee hearings, meant to rehash the same imagined crimes – the elements within the U.S. Government working against this President are ever more far reaching than the general public might know.
Not only are the Leftists in Government, Education and Media attempting to overthrow the U.S. President, another major element in America has been fighting his efforts to help America from day one – the Courts.
In Part I it was discussed what was happening within American Counties being Democrat-controlled – releasing bad people who just happened to have entered the U.S. illegally; to rape and murder their constituents in order to poke the President in the eye on all issues of National Security via Border and Immigration control.
How bad is it?
I will spend some time revealing what my investigations show as to just how rampant Court Judges, appointed by Democrats – are destroying every effort Donald Trump makes to keep America safe and for Americans.
As soon as Donald Trump announces an Executive Order, even though it is fully legal and within his rights as the Commander-in-Chief, Leftists and their attorneys immediately run to the nearest Liberal Judge to either rule his actions as Unconstitutional – or block his actions outright via a Court Injunction.
Not only do those in the Public sector litigate against Donald Trump, law suits via the Private sector also abound. Via Wikipedia:
Legal affairs of Donald Trump
An analysis by USA Today published in June 2016 found that over the previous three decades, Donald Trump and his businesses have been involved in 3,500 legal cases in U.S. federal courts and state court, an unprecedented number for a U.S. presidential candidate. Of the 3,500 suits, Trump or one of his companies were plaintiffs in 1,900; defendants in 1,450; and bankruptcy, third party, or other in 150. Trump was named in at least 169 suits in federal court. Over 150 other cases were in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida (covering Broward County, Florida) since 1983. In about 500 cases, judges dismissed plaintiffs' claims against Trump. In hundreds more, cases ended with the available public record unclear about the resolution. Where there was a clear resolution, Trump won 451 times, and lost 38.
Here’s Journalistic malarkey from one of the leading advocates of Fake News – the Daily Kos.
If you do any independent study you will find this analysis to be totally false and an outright lie. There are plenty of stories in other Media sources depicting the exact opposite.
In this investigation, however, we will deal with Court actions in relationship to the Donald Trump Presidential Administration.
75 Lawsuits Against President-Elect Trump - The Daily Beast
Sinking the Ship of State to Spite the Captain
Right away you get the flavor of the following ‘report’. Who is the information coming from? The Washington Post – a news source suffering Trump Derangement Syndrome from day one.
Report: 60+ Court Decisions Have Ruled Trump Policies Unconstitutional
While Trump himself has lambasted Democratic-appointed judges and the 9th Circuit Court specifically as being a “big thorn” in his administration’s side, the analysis shows that he’s losing in districts across the country, and that Republican-appointed judges are also ruling against him.
I will attempt to check the veracity of this Wapo story – another national leader in the Fake News industry.
First, I must inform the reader that searching for Court rulings and Injunctions against the President (Bing), I get listing after listing from Leftwing sources. The first occurring links are:
The New York Times
This will be a tough row to hoe. These ‘news’ sources are totally leftwing and biased.
I’ll start out in 2017 and show that the Bible used by Trump to be sworn in to the Presidency must have still been warm when the Leftwing apparatus in America began using the Courts against good things he was doing for the Country.
After each headline detailing legal actions against the President will be the Judge(s) making those decisions and from whence came their appointments to the Bench.
1-30-17 (Travel Ban)
Washington v. Trump - Wikipedia
Executive Order 13769, titled Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States
On February 3, 2017, Judge James Robart issued a nationwide temporary restraining order
Appointed by George W. Bush
2-3-17 (Travel Ban)
DHS IG Who Let Obama Defy Court Rulings Against Illegal ...
The Obama-appointed inspector general who looked the other way when his boss enacted illegal amnesty programs and ignored federal court injunctions blocking them has launched an investigation into President Donald Trump’s executive order temporarily banning travel from seven Muslim-majority countries.
2-10-17 (Travel Ban)
Court Ruling Against Trump’s Executive Order Shows the
A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has repeated the mistakes made by the district court judge who stayed President Donald Trump’s executive order temporarily suspending visas from seven terrorist havens.
Both the judge in Washington state and the San Francisco-based circuit court have now refused to recognize the authority of Congress and the president to make this national security decision.
Neither the judge in Washington state nor the court has offered anything approaching a detailed discussion of 8 U.SC. §1182 (f), the law which specifically gives the president authority to suspend the entry of any aliens into the U.S. if he believes their entry would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States.”
Unless this statutory provision is unconstitutional, the president has acted completely within the law.
(9th Circuit Court)
Eight of out of 10cases from the 9th Circuit reviewed by the Supreme Court are overruled, according to a 2010 analysis published by the American Bar Association. The 9th Circuit, which is known for its liberal tendencies, has the second-highest reversal rate of the 13 appellate courts below the Supreme Court.)
3-15-17 (Revised Travel Ban)
Judges use Trump’s own words in ruling against revised ...
A federal judge in Hawaii issued a worldwide restraining order against enforcement of key parts of President Donald Trump’s revised travel ban executive order just hours before the directive was set to kick in, backed up by asecond federal judge in Maryland who put out his own ruling blocking parts of the order.
U.S. District Court Judge Derrick Watson ruled Wednesday that the state of Hawaii and a local Muslim leader had “a strong likelihood of success on their claim” that Trump’s order intentionally targets Muslims and therefore violates the Constitution’s guarantee against establishment of religion.
Appointed by Barack Obama
4-6-17 (Funds for Sanctuary Cities)
Federal judge issues ruling against Trump executive order
Federal Judge William Orrick has issued an order blocking the implementation of President Trump's executive order that targets funds for sanctuary cities.
The judge said the order "probably" violates the Constitution because it undermines both federalism and the separation of powers. The judge also rejected the arguments made by Department of Justice attorneys because they conflicted with the plain language wording of the orders and statements by the president and other administration officials about the intent of the funding cut-off for sanctuary cities.
Appointed by Richard Nixon
5-25-17 (Travel Ban)
Thoughts on the appellate court decision against Trump’s
In a 10-3 decision today, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has upheld a trial court injunction against President Trump’s revised travel ban executive order, temporarily barring citizens of six Muslim-majority nations from entering the United States. The text of the ruling is here.
Much of the court’s reasoning follows that of the two lower court rulings against the revised ban: the president’s order is unconstitutional because its supposed national security rationale is a pretext for the true purpose: discrimination against Muslims. Like the trial court rulings, Chief Judge Roger Gregory’s opinion for the Fourth Circuit relies on the President Trump’s many campaign statements advocating a “Muslim ban,” as well as more recent statements by both the president and his advisers indicating that the first and second travel ban orders were outgrowths of this campaign agenda.
Appointed by Bill Clinton
6-12-17 (Revised Travel Ban)
Another U.S. appeals court rules against Trump's revised ...
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco was reviewed a March ruling by a Hawaii-based federal judge that blocked parts of Trump’s order. The ruling came after a separate court, the Richmond, Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, on May 25 upheld a Maryland judge’s ruling blocking parts of the order.
The Trump administration on June 1 asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block the Hawaii and Richmond rulings and revive the ban.
See 9thCircuit info following 2-10-17 ruling.
6-26-17 (SCOTUS overturns Travel Ban injunctions)
Supreme Court travel ban ruling a huge win for Trump ...
Monday's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court allowing just about all of President Donald Trump's travel and immigration ban to go into effect is a very significant victory for his administration.
"The exclusion of aliens is a fundamental act of sovereignty … inherent in the executive power," the Supreme Court said in 1950.
One of those lower court decisions, the Ninth Circuit, insisted that non-citizens holding a visa had due process, such as a hearing or notice, prior to the government restricting their travel. In other words, the lower courts were giving visa holders the due process rights only American citizens have enjoyed for more than 220 years of U.S. law. That was a decidedly problematic decision that violated all legal precedent.
See 9th Circuit info following 2-10-17 ruling.
Supreme Court rules AGAINST adding question to 2020 census! (from the rightscoop.com)
Here’s what J. Christian Adams had to say about this ruling if it helps to clarify it:
“Chief Justice Roberts unfortunately was the deciding vote,” PILF President and General Counsel J. Christian Adams said. “He agreed with the arguments of the institutional Left that how the Census question was added was more important than the common sense of asking the question in the first place. This is an unfortunate victory for the Swamp that opposed collecting facts about how many aliens are in the United States.”
This directly affects the demographics in America as the Census determines apportionment of Representation in the House of Representatives. And you thought it was because Democrats are so compassionate.
6-30-17 (Trump accused of child rape)
Why The New Child Rape Case Filed Against Donald Trump ...
Article by Left-wing Huffington Post
9-8-17 (Scope of Travel Ban)
9th Circuit Appeals Court rules against Trump on scope of travel ban
9-19-17 (Expansion of Coal Mining)
A conservative-leaning court just issued a surprise ruling ...
Late last week, a federal court knocked down plans to expand coal mining in the Western US, adding to a growing body of rulings against the Trump administration’s efforts to push climate change off the agenda.
(10th Circuit Court of Appeals)
12-5-17 (More than 12 women accuse Trump of sex assault) Lawsuit Could Put Trump's Sexual Misconduct ... - NPR.org
Justice Jennifer Schecter-Endorsed by the 504 Democratic Club
12-11-17 (Transgender Military Ban) Third court rules against Trump's transgender military ban
U.S. District Judge Marsha Pechman-Appointed by Bill Clinton
U.S. Judge Emmet Sullivan-Appointed by Bill Clinton
12-22-17 (Travel Ban)
Appeals court rules against Trump travel ban 3.0 - POLITICO
9th Circuit Judges Michael Daly Hawkins, Ronald Gould and Richard Paez-All appointed by Bill Clinton
The name “Robart” may be familiar to some of you. That’s because this is the same judge who was first to rule the initial travel ban was illegal.
12-29-17 (Travel Ban)
DOJ gives up on appealing court rulings against Trump’s ...
Do we have a major problem with Activist Judges? You bet. Read next about the Supreme Court again spanking the childish rulings by lower court activist Judges:
SCOTUS Continues Rebuke of Lower Court Rulings Against Trump
In recent weeks the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly chided lower courts that issued rulings unfavorable to the Trump administration, suggesting at least some of the justices believe the judiciary is not treating the Trump administration fairly.
I’ll just let it end there for 2017, but I think you get the idea. Let’s move to 2018. Did you notice on 6-26 the Supreme Court had to correct the Activist Judges overreach and the link to the Supreme Court expressing frustration with their activities?
3-20-18 (Woman claims Trump defamed her)
Judge rules defamation case against Trump may proceed ...
Justice Jennifer Schecter-Endorsed by the 504 Democratic Club
4-17-18 (Deportation of criminal immigrants)
Trump Supreme Court pick sides with liberals in ...
Neil Gorsuch – appointed by Trump
4-9-18 (Sanctuary Cities)
Appeals court rules against Trump policy punishing ...
Three Judges all Republican appointees
6-15-18 (Mueller, Manafort, Avenatti, Cohen, Stormy Daniels)
Trump supporters won't like the rulings in these 3 court cases
6-26-18 (SCOTUS again upholds Executive Order)
Supreme Court upholds Trump travel ban, president claims
Jun 27, 2018 · Supreme Court upholds Trump travel ban, president claims vindication from 'hysterical' critics Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissent that the ruling ignores the “pain and suffering the (ban…
Sotomayor – appointed by Barack Obama
7-9-18 (Denying Visas to foreigners in tech industry)
Trump Strategy Against H-1B Visas Could Fall In Court
On May 1, 2018, as previously reported, immigration attorney Jonathan Wasden filed the case of Small and Medium Enterprise Consortium (SMEC) v. DHS in the U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey. Wasden was a trial attorney in the Office of Immigration Litigation at the U.S. Department of Justice and an attorney in the USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO).
8-2-2018 (Withholding grants to Sanctuary Cities)
Appeals Court Rules Against Trump Effort to Deny Grants to ...
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
(9th Circuit Court of Appeals)
11-23-18 (Suit against Trump Foundation)
N.Y. Supreme Court rules against Trump, won't dismiss ...
Janet DiFiore - appointed by Andrew Cuomo
Rowan D. Wilson – appointed by Andrew Cuomo
Jenny Rivera - appointed by Andrew Cuomo
Leslie Stein - appointed by Andrew Cuomo
Michael Garcia - appointed by Andrew Cuomo
Paul G Feinman - appointed by Andrew Cuomo
Eugene M Fahey - appointed by Andrew Cuomo
(Andrew Cuomo – Democrat)
Federal Court Rules Against Trump in Sanctuary Cities Case ...
Federal Judge Edgardo Ramos of the Southern District of New York – appointed by Barack Obama
There could be more but let’s now move to 2019.
Judge rules against Trump, paves way for banks to provide
U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos – appointed by Barack Obama
Judge Amit Mehta of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia – appointed by Barack Obama
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals (14 Democrat appointed Judges – 13 Republican appointed Judges)
Sri Srinivasan and Robert Wilkins appointed by Barack Obama; Laurence Silberman – appointed by George W. Bush
Against allowing the Citizenship question:
Chief Justice John Roberts (George W. Bush), Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Bill Clinton), Stephen Breyer (Bill Clinton), Sonia Sotomayor (Barack Obama) and Elena Kagan (Barack Obama)
Note: It was Chief Justice John Roberts that gave us Obamacare by telling the Government it could be treated as a tax – something Democrats vehemently denied until his ruling.
Federal Court Rules Against Trump in Border Wall Cases
Federal District Judge Haywood Gilliam of the Northern District of California – appointed by Barack Obama
Appeals Court Rules Against Trump in Border Wall Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeals Court Revives Emoluments Case Against Trump
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals (14 Democrat appointed Judges – 13 Republican appointed Judges)
“Trump appointee Neomi Rao dissented from the three-judge panel’s ruling. The other judges are Patricia Millett, appointed by President Barack Obama and David Tatel, appointed by President Bill Clinton”
AG James Secures Court Order Against Donald J. Trump
New York Attorney General Letitia James – Democrat
Kobach: Activist Judge Negates One of the Oldest Rules of U.S. Immigration Law
Judge Michael Simon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon – appointed by Barack Obama
In December of 2019, as the Impeachment of Donald Trump plays out across television screens in America – the intensity builds.
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals (14 Democrat appointed Judges – 13 Republican appointed Judges)
Federal judge blocks use of Pentagon funds to build border
1 hour ago · (CNN) - A federal judge in Texas blocked the Trump administration from using billions of dollars in Pentagon funds for the construction of the border wall.
Federal Judge Backs People-Powered We Build The Wall, Inc. – Shreds Federal Lawyers For IBCW
The border wall, IBCW claims, would violate the United States’ 1970 international water treaty with Mexico by causing flooding that would alter the course of the international waterway and destruct the shoreline.
In response, U.S. District Judge Randy Crane issued a restraining or mandating We Build the Wall suspend construction and ordered the government to disclose the results of a hydrology study that would substantiate its unfounded charges.
During a hearing Thursday at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas in McAllen, U.S. Attorney E. Paxton Warner (member of Society Pre-law Young Democrats at University of Texas Pan-American), claimed the Federal Emergency Management Agency has already conducted a mapping study that confirms the construction of a border wall would cause catastrophic environmental damage on the river banks by utilizing expensive state of the art Light Detection and Ranging equipment, also known as LIDAR.
Yet, FEMA claimed has declined to provide its study to IBCW, Warner admitted.
U.S. District Judge Randy Crane appointed by George W. Bush
Supreme Court blocks Trump administration's plan to execute Indiana inmate
The US Supreme Court on Friday temporarily blocked White House plans to reinstate executions for federal death row inmates.
Attorney General William Barr had announced in July that a federal review of capital punishment and issues surrounding lethal injection drugs, commissioned by former President Barack Obama in 2014, had concluded and paved the way for resuming executions.
The executions of five federal inmates were scheduled to take place between December 9 and January 15.
But four of the death row inmates challenged the legality of the lethal injection protocol and lower courts stayed the executions, effectively placing them on hold. The Trump administration took the matter to the Supreme Court, but the nine justices ultimately backed the lower court decisions.
US District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan of the District of Columbia said the public interest is not served by "executing individuals before they have had the opportunity to avail themselves of legitimate procedures to challenge the legality of their executions."
US District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan of the District of Columbia – appointed by Barack Obama
Flynn Judge Accuses Defense Counsel In Curious Plagiarism Claim
The District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct apply to the proceedings in this Court. See LCrR 57.26. Rule8.4(c) provides that “[i]t is professional misconduct for a lawyer to . . . [e]ngage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.” D.C. Rules of Prof’l Conduct R.8.4(c); see In re Ayeni, 822 A.2d 420, 421 (D.C. 2003) (per curiam) (lawyer’s plagiarized brief violated Rule 8.4(c)).“[C]itation to authority is absolutely required when language is borrowed.”United States v. Bowen, 194 F. App’x 393, 402 n.3(6th Cir.
Wait. Powell cited and had a hyperlink to the source of that material, but it warrants a section accusing her of plagiarism and ethical violations?
United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Emmet G. Sullivan – appointed by Bill Clinton
It has already been shown the FBI hid exculpatory evidence (evidence to show not guilty), from the Courts.
NY State Judge Dismisses Manafort Case, Paving Way For Pardon
A judge dismissed New York’s mortgage-fraud case against former Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort, undermining the state’s effort to ensure that the jailed political adviser doesn’t go free if he’s eventually pardoned for his federal crimes.
Bloomberg reports that State Supreme Court Justice Maxwell Wiley on Wednesday granted Manafort’s request to dismiss the charges because the state indictment overlaps with cases previously brought by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
Manafort lawyers argued that New York’s broad double-jeopardy law protects defendants from multiple prosecutions for the same conduct, even if they were charged in other jurisdictions or by different government authorities. They’ve suggested the New York case was politically motivated.
“This indictment should never have been brought, and today’s decision is a stark reminder that the law and justice should always prevail over politically motivated actions.”
State Supreme Court Justice Maxwell Wiley – cannot find appointment information.
Supreme Court leaves cities with one option on homelessness: More housing
The U.S. Supreme Court decided against hearing an appeal of the landmark case City of Boise vs. Martin, letting stand a ruling that amounts to a broad curb on police powers in California and eight other states to stop people from sleeping on public property if no other shelter is available.
In doing so, the justices took yet another tool out of the municipal toolkit for preventing people from building sprawling encampments that increasingly clog their sidewalks and streets.
By declining to take the case on Monday, the high court let stand a 2018 ruling from the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which found that it is unconstitutional to prosecute people for sleeping on public property if enough shelter or housing isn’t available as an alternative. Police can still intervene when there is criminal activity, however, such as drug use.
Original ruling in the 9thCircuit Court of Appeals
New Mexico teen gets 30 days in jail for killing man, shouting 'that's what you get!' after shooting him
A New Mexico teen who allegedly fatally shot a man — and told him he deserved it — will serve just 30 days behind bars for murder, according to officials.
Santiago Armijo, 17, is one of two teens involved in the murder of Larry DeSantiago, 25, at a park in Albuquerque in March 2018. Witnesses told investigators they saw DeSantiago chase Armijo and his friend, Jeremiah De La Pena, 16, toward the top of a hill before Armijo shot him in the chest.
Jaramillo told the victim's family her "hands were tied" because the maximum possible sentence for the teen would be four years in juvie. Prosecutors asked for the maximum sentence.
Judge Christina Jaramillo – Second Judicial Circuit Court
FISA court review order leaves out key FBI players implicated in Horowitz report
Earlier this month, the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Court (FISC) ordered the FBI to re-verify all previous warrant applications involving the FBI attorney who falsified evidence against the former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. However, Fox News has learned the court did not order the FBI to double-check warrant applications involving other officials who made key omissions and errors in warrant applications as the bureau sought to surveil Page.
The FISC's failure to request a comprehensive evaluation of previous submissions has stunned court-watchers who have questioned whether enough is being done to deter future misconduct by the FBI. In the past, the FISC has gone so far as to prohibit some FBI agents from appearing before the court after finding impropriety.
This only confirms my suspicion that the FISA Judges were complicit in the effort to undermine the Trump presidency. I have no confidence the actual truth will be known as those in Government agencies protect themselves by any means possible.
Obama Appointee Blocks North Carolina from Requiring Voter ID
U.S. District Court Judge Loretta Biggs has delayed a decision on North Carolina voter ID legislation until next week.
Judge Biggs, an Obama appointee, has temporarily blocked measures that would require legal identification at the ballot box in 2020. Notification of the delay was appended to NAACP et al v. Cooper, one of two lawsuits challenging the new restrictions. The decision comes just before a statewide mailing which would explain them.
“The court gave advance notice that it will rule with plaintiffs and preliminarily enjoin the photo voter ID law next week,” Caitlin Swain, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said in an e-mail statement. “We are awaiting the full order, gratified that the court is intervening to prevent this discriminatory law from impeding North Carolinians equal access to the ballot.”
How does showing an I.D. to vote discriminate? Just another tactic by an activist Judge. It would surprise me if the Judge rules in favor of those in State Government making the law because Judges are supposed to support laws but instead, these days, they make laws from the Bench. Note the Judge being an Obama appointee.
Democrats have vigorously fought any clean-up of voter rolls and any initiative to prohibit illegal voting. Why? They are liars and cheaters.
‘Against all common sense’: one judge’s slap at New York’s new no-bail law
“The law is stupid, but I have to follow it”: So said Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Maxwell Wiley moments before releasing without bail suspects charged with burglary and robbery.
A growing chorus of New Yorkers and law enforcement folks believe, like Judge Wiley, that the criminal justice reforms that fully kick in Jan. 1 go “against all common sense and wisdom.”
If a law passed by a Republican-controlled State Legislature to increase bail amounts, a Liberal Judge would not state he or she had to obey the law. Instead, Democrats would have run to a Democrat-appointed Judge who would immediately order an injunction against the law.
The Court rulings and injunctions listed for 2017 thru 2019 are nearly all against measures to protect American borders, to protect America from an invasion of illegals seeking a free ride via the American taxpayer, measures to not allow gender-confused Liberals to enter our military ranks, cutting off funds to State and Local Governments openly defying immigration laws, measures to given greater protection to victims of crime and measures to keep those out of the Country who migrate from Countries that sponsor terrorism.
Many are meant to reinforce the scores of criminal charges leveled against the President.
Many of these Judicial activities are Anti-American. But who does the Mainstream Media prop up? The lying sacks of crap so hell bent on destroying the wonderful traditions that made us the greatest nation on earth.
These traditions were protected Constitutionally – until the Communists so pervaded our sources of information, education and an entire political Party – one wearing a Mask emblazoned with the word, “Democrats” across its front – a Mask leading to Communism and Totalitarianism – known by the description – Dictatorship.
We cannot hold anyone living today accountable for what happened years. But, from the Civil War being started by Democrats, the moves in Government towards Socialism via Social Security, the Welfare Acts and changes to Immigration rules of 1965 and Obamacare in 2009 – all came at the hands of Democrats. They established a precedent and follow it to this day. Destroy traditions, religion and the culture – a hallmark of Communism and misery.
They would be content to rule over the ash heap that was once the United States of America.
All that is entailed in this writing ties in directly with my previous book, “America’s 2nd Civil War” – because the way things are going there is no way to stop it.