Here’s a beauty of deceptive headlining. The Left does this knowing the uninformed only need a headline in order to make judgments about people.

U.S. diplomat directly ties Trump to Ukraine plot

This is the teaser once you click on the link:

The congressional testimony of Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, was the latest transcript released in relation to the impeachment inquiry of President Trump. In his testimony, Taylor stated that it was his “clear understanding, security assistance money would not come until the president [of Ukraine] committed to pursue the investigation." When asked if he was "aware that quid pro quo literally means this for that,” Taylor answered “I am.”

And let’s not forget Bing’s stories linked from the search phrase I typed in:

 “Diplomat Taylor testimony on quid pro quo”

There are thirteen headline links based on this search. One is from Fox News, an agency teetering on the brink of going full-Fake News. The rest of the links are to:

The Guardian
Vanity Fair
The Atlantic
Raw Story
The Guardian

All of the above are 24/7 Anti-Trump in their reporting. But, this is how Bing gives the search terms priority. There is nothing fair or balanced by the majority of the Media today. That accounts for ignorant people embracing “diversity”, “slave eparations”, “socialism”, “Communism”, “State-run Healthcare” and a myriad of Dictatorial Government schemes.

But if you do a modicum of research on this story, you just may stumble over this tidbit I take from my daily Notes on current events:

Bill Taylor Cites NYT as Sole Source for His Claim Trump Wanted Ukraine to Launch Probe to Get Dirt on Biden

U.S. diplomat Bill Taylor, during his deposition last month, identified the New York Times as the sole source of his claim that President Donald Trump wanted Ukraine to help him get dirt on Joe Biden, transcripts released Wednesday show.

Taylor suggested that Trump wanted Ukraine to launch investigations into corruption allegations against the former vice president and his son Hunter and potential U.S. election interference only to get information on his political rival Joe Biden.

The U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Taylor, revealed that the Times was the only source for his reasoning.

This is just like the DOJ getting FISA warrants to spy on Trump based on news reports leaked to the Press by John Brennan. God, these people really need to be tried and executed, starting with Hillary Clinton.


That’s right, America, he got his testimony from a story by the ever-Trump-loving, New York Times – deserving to be renamed; the New York Crimes.

Not enough for you? Here is a cropped image from CNN today. Go below the bold headlines and you’ll see, “Analysis: The factor that could condemn Trump to Impeachment”

If I may bring up things I remember and Liberals don’t; supposedly they were to Impeach Trump for collusion with Russia to steal an Election; then they were to Impeach Trump for Obstruction of Justice; now they want to Impeach Trump over some secret message he managed to hide within a released transcript of a phone call with the leader of the Ukraine.

What’s next, his choice of sock color?

Since before his inauguration the Democrats and their Treasonous allies within Government have been concocting imaginary criminal acts against the President.

You know why? Because he is NOT a Politician – and that’s why the economy, jobs and wages are moving upward – and for that, he has to go!

But, wait! As the TV advertisers say! There’s more deception afoot. Drudge used to be a fair and balanced link source but this year he’s gone nearly full Fake News. Look at the headline featured here:

To a Liberal this is just another juicy headline to abuse the President. But, if you ACTUALLY read the report, it says this in its headline:

Bolton willing to defy White House and testify if court clears the way, according to people familiar with his views

Yes, IF the court clears the way, keeping it all legal. But that is not what the frontpage headline is trying to portray. And just who are these “people familiar with his views”? Is that like, “Sources close to the matter” or “Unnamed sources say”?

Nice try, Drudge, but your linking is sinking to unprecedented depths of BS. Just another happy day in America for Liberals, who don’t worry about Truth because they never look for it!

But, there’s more!



On the Homepage:

Trump say public hearings on Ukraine would be a hoax after six transcripts of testimony have been released

The Story inside: Moments ago, President Trump also said the House shouldn't have public hearings in the impeachment inquiry.
(I cannot find the above quote on any of the other top new sources?)



Trump claims impeachment making him 'stronger,' rails against whistleblower

The rhetoric shows Trump deploying the same playbook he used during former special counsel Robert S. Mueller's investigation into alleged collusion with Russia during the 2016 election.

And at the bottom of the article we see who is contributing to the FOX Fake News agenda:

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 


But wait!


See new impeachment evidence cornering Trump's top aide Mulvaney

Two key witnesses have linked the Ukraine bribery plot to Trump’s acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney. Army Officer Vindland and National Security Official Fiona Hill have both testified that Mick Mulvaney was actively involved in arranging meetings regarding the Ukraine investigation into the Biden’s in exchange for military aide, further engulfing him in the center of the impeachment probe. Peggy Noonan, Tony Schwartz and Mark Thompson join Ari Melber.

One: There is no evidence of a “bribery plot”
Two: There is no evidence of meetings being arranged in exchange for Military aid
Three: The only thing truthful in the above paragraph is the lying panel members

More Fake News from MSNBC, first headline on their website today. There is NO new impeachment evidence. The headline implies wrongdoing but the inside story cites none. Game, set, match.